![]() ![]() That’s because their technical meanings are far from their ordinary ones. The terms detail and macro get confused a lot. A macro shot of a flower that captures the pistils inside it. A detail shot that captures these pasqueflowers and unbinds them from their boring background. Photographing just the pistils in the flowers? That’s macro photography. Photographing whole flowers? That’s close-ups. The same kind of situation comes up in flower photography. In this picture, the insect’s head is magnified, and so this can be considered macro. But they do amount to ways of shooting macro without a special lens. ![]() Naturally, both approaches have their downsides. Shoot with your lens turned backwards.Buy a macro extension tube set, which lets you zoom in the way you need.With that lens, you can take a picture of the dragonfly’s head at 1:1 scale.īut in certain circumstances, you can shoot macro using a traditional lens after all. So to take a true macro photo, you need a special macro lens, so that you can bring the subject closer. A photo of a dragonfly this is a detail shot, because it doesn’t pass the line of 1:1 zoom. So you have to make do with photographing details you can’t dive any deeper. When you’re using an ordinary lens with no special adjustments, you generally can’t shoot macro. So this amounts to extracting the dragonfly from its environment or background and creating a detail shot. The dragonfly is too large to fit on the sensor chip at 1:1 scale. So when you photograph a dragonfly sitting on a blade of grass, that’s detail, not macro. After all, you’ll find details even in landscapes and portraits-or for example reportage, when you use a telephoto lens to obtain only a certain crop out of the events on a street. While macro is mainly useful when you’re photographing insects and small objects, every photographer will encounter details. This kind of approach lets you find many interesting details in bland landscapes. My telephoto lens has let me take this detail shot of the atmospheric inversion in the valley. So in detail shots, a photographer divides the scene into smaller photographic units that they find to be more interesting than the whole.Īs for “close-up,” that’s clear enough: you take these photos from close up. The word “detail” comes from the French détailler : to divide or cut. Īs the name implies, ”detail” photography means a part of a larger whole. 1:2, is detail photography, also called close-ups. And meanwhile, anything that’s not quite as zoomed in, e.g. With a scale of over 30:1, that’s no longer macro, but instead microphotography. So in the 1:1 through 30:1 range, we’re talking about macro. That means that when you’re photographing an object with a size of 1 cm, it will also be at most 1 cm on the camera chip. We’re talking about macro photography when a photo’s subject reaches the camera’s chip at a real scale of 1:1 through 30:1. So let’s close in and get these two straight. But we don’t all really understand it, and we especially mix it up with close-ups: photos of details. It’s hard not to know the word “macro” as a photographer. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |